Structural Collapse Due to Inadequate or Failed Props
HighThe primary hazard in acrow prop work is catastrophic structural collapse resulting from inadequate prop capacity, incorrect positioning, insufficient quantity of props, or prop failure during use. This hazard manifests when props are undersized for the loads they must support, when props are positioned in locations that create ineffective load paths allowing structures to deflect or rotate, when too few props are installed to adequately distribute structural loads, when prop foundations fail through settlement or punch-through into floors or ground, or when props buckle under overload conditions. Structural collapses during demolition occur without warning and with devastating consequences—workers beneath or adjacent to supported structures have no opportunity to escape as tonnes of concrete, masonry, or steel frame collapse in seconds. The violence of structural collapse is compounded by the momentum of falling materials and the confined nature of demolition work areas where escape routes are often limited. Props that appear adequate may fail suddenly when demolition activities change load distributions, when unexpected structural conditions are encountered, or when props are prematurely removed before alternative supports are in place. The catastrophic nature of this hazard demands absolute attention to engineering design, installation precision, and continuous monitoring throughout the demolition sequence.
Manual Handling Injuries During Prop Installation
MediumAcrow props are substantial steel components with individual props weighing between 25kg and 50kg depending on size and extension length. Installation work requires repeated manual handling of these heavy components often in awkward positions, confined spaces, or at height. Workers must lift props from ground level, carry them to installation positions, manoeuvre them into vertical orientation, adjust extension mechanisms, and position them precisely as specified in structural engineering drawings. This repetitive heavy work creates significant manual handling injury risks including acute back injuries from lifting props from ground level or from vehicle beds, shoulder and upper limb injuries from overhead positioning of props when supporting elevated structures, lower back strain from maintaining awkward bent or twisted postures during prop adjustment in confined spaces, hand and finger injuries from handling adjustment collars and pins with tools in cramped conditions, and cumulative musculoskeletal disorders from repeated prop installation activities over extended project durations. The manual handling challenge is compounded when props must be installed in difficult locations including ceiling spaces with restricted headroom, underfloor areas requiring workers to work in crouched positions, on uneven or sloping surfaces where maintaining balance while handling props is difficult, and in areas with restricted access where props cannot be mechanically delivered close to installation points. Workers may attempt to handle props without adequate assistance to maintain project momentum, may improvise unsafe handling methods when proper equipment is not available, or may work through pain and discomfort rather than reporting injuries and requesting modified duties.
Prop Instability and Tipping During Installation or Adjustment
HighDuring installation, adjustment, and demolition operations, acrow props can become unstable and tip or fall, creating struck-by hazards for workers. This hazard occurs during initial prop positioning before props are fully extended and bearing on upper structures, during prop adjustment when props are temporarily loosened and may lose stability, when props are installed on uneven or sloping surfaces without proper packing, when props are disturbed by demolition activities including vibration from equipment or impact from falling debris, or during prop removal when props are deliberately unloaded and may fall as they are taken out of service. An unsupported acrow prop standing more than 2 metres tall but not yet extended to contact upper structure is inherently unstable and will topple if disturbed. Props being adjusted or removed may suddenly release stored energy as loads are transferred, causing props to spring back or fall. Props installed on inadequate foundations may tilt or settle during use, creating instability. Workers can be struck by falling props weighing up to 50kg resulting in serious impact injuries, props that fall during installation may damage the structures they are intended to support, and unstable props create general site hazards affecting all workers in the vicinity. The risk is heightened when multiple props are being installed or removed simultaneously, when props must be installed in congested work areas with multiple trades operating, and during adverse weather conditions including high winds that can destabilise unsupported props.
Inadequate Foundation Support Causing Prop Settlement or Punch-Through
HighAcrow props transfer structural loads downward through their base plates into whatever foundation or support structure they rest upon. When foundation support is inadequate, props will settle, tilt, or punch through the supporting surface, compromising the entire temporary support system. This hazard manifests when props are placed on suspended floors without assessment of the floor's load-carrying capacity, when base plates rest on thin concrete slabs that crack and fail under concentrated prop loads, when props are installed on soil or excavated ground that settles under load particularly after rainfall, when base plates rest on loose packing materials including timber offcuts or bricks that compress or shift under load, or when foundation conditions deteriorate during demolition due to vibration, moisture ingress, or removal of adjacent structural elements. Inadequate foundations cause progressive failure where initial settlement overloads adjacent props, causing cascading failure across the entire propping system. Floors supporting prop loads may exhibit flexure, cracking, or deflection indicating imminent failure but workers may not recognise these warning signs. Punch-through failures can be sudden and catastrophic particularly when props rest on suspended timber floors, thin concrete slabs, or loosely compacted ground. The hazard is particularly insidious because foundation adequacy is not always visually apparent—seemingly solid surfaces may conceal voids, weak materials, or structural degradation that only becomes apparent when props are loaded. Regular monitoring and adjustment procedures are essential but easily neglected during the urgency of demolition work.
Premature Prop Removal Before Alternative Support is Established
HighOne of the most common causes of structural collapse during demolition is the premature removal of acrow props before alternative permanent support structures are in place or before the demolition sequence permits safe prop removal. This hazard occurs when workers remove props assuming the structure above is self-supporting when in fact critical load paths still depend on temporary support, when props are removed in incorrect sequence allowing structures to become unstable before all props are out, when communication failures mean different trades remove props without understanding their continued necessity, when props are removed prematurely to facilitate other work activities or to free equipment for other projects, or when demolition scope changes and props that were originally planned to remain in place are removed based on field decisions without engineering reassessment. The temptation to remove props prematurely is strong because props represent valuable equipment tied up in one project, because props may obstruct subsequent work activities, or because structures appear stable leading workers to conclude props are no longer necessary. However, appearances are deceiving in partially demolished structures where critical load paths may not be visually obvious. Props must only be removed in accordance with structural engineering specifications, in the approved sequence, and only after verification that alternative support is in place or that the remaining structure is genuinely self-supporting. The consequences of premature prop removal are invariably catastrophic as structures immediately collapse once critical support is lost.