Comprehensive SWMS for Work Near Overhead Power Lines

Overhead Electric Lines - Working Near Safe Work Method Statement

2,000+ Australian Businesses Trust OneClickSWMS
Generate SWMS NowView Sample PDF

No credit card required • Instant access • 100% compliant in every Australian state

5 sec
Creation Time
100%
Compliant
2,000+
Companies
$3.6K
Fines Avoided

Avoid WHS penalties up to $3.6M—issue compliant SWMS to every crew before work starts.

Working near overhead electric lines presents severe electrocution risks that have resulted in numerous construction worker fatalities across Australia. High voltage electricity can arc across air gaps without physical contact, making proximity alone potentially lethal. This SWMS addresses the critical safety requirements for work near overhead power lines including voltage identification, minimum approach distance determination, exclusion zone establishment, spotter procedures, emergency response for contact incidents, and coordination with electrical utilities in compliance with Australian electrical safety regulations and state-specific overhead power line safety requirements.

Start Generating SWMSSee How It Works

Unlimited drafts • Built-in WHS compliance • Works across every Australian state

Overview

What this SWMS covers

Overhead electric power lines are present across virtually all Australian construction sites and work environments, delivering electricity from generating stations through transmission and distribution networks to end users. These conductors carry voltages ranging from 230V single-phase residential supply through 11kV, 22kV, and 33kV high-voltage distribution up to 500kV ultra-high-voltage transmission. Work activities that position personnel, equipment, vehicles, or materials near these energised conductors create severe electrocution risks requiring comprehensive safety controls to prevent contact and maintain minimum safe approach distances. Electricity supply infrastructure consists of several voltage classifications each with distinct safety implications. Low voltage (LV) encompasses electricity supply up to 1000 volts including standard 230V single-phase and 415V three-phase services supplying residential and light commercial premises. Whilst termed 'low voltage,' these supplies remain capable of causing fatal electrocution with currents of 50 milliamps sufficient to cause ventricular fibrillation and death. High voltage (HV) includes distribution voltages from 1000V up to 66,000V commonly seen as 11kV, 22kV, or 33kV overhead lines supplying suburbs and industrial areas. These voltages can arc across significant air gaps and cause immediate fatality through cardiac arrest and severe burns. Extra high voltage (EHV) encompasses transmission voltages from 66kV to 330kV used for bulk power transmission across regions. Ultra high voltage (UHV) includes transmission lines operating at 500kV and above, capable of arcing across gaps exceeding 6 metres. Identifying power line voltage is critical for determining required minimum approach distances, yet voltage cannot be determined visually with certainty. Multiple conductors on the same pole structure may carry different voltages. Voltage indicators include conductor size with larger conductors typically indicating higher voltages, insulator configuration with more insulators or longer insulator strings indicating higher voltages, pole height and structure complexity with taller poles and more complex cross-arm configurations suggesting higher voltages, and the presence of substations or transformers nearby. However, these indicators are imprecise—the only reliable voltage confirmation comes from the electrical network operator who owns and operates the lines. All power line voltage should be assumed to be high voltage unless confirmed otherwise by the network operator, and even with confirmation, conservative safety margins should be maintained. Minimum approach distances are legally mandated clearances that must be maintained between any person, any part of the person's body, any object being handled, any tool or equipment being used, any vehicle, plant, or structure, and energised overhead power line conductors. These distances account for electrical arcing potential, worker movement during work, wind effects moving conductors or elevated equipment, and human error in position estimation. The distances vary by voltage level and are specified in state and territory electrical safety regulations. General approach distances for untrained persons include 1 metre for low voltage up to 1000V, 3 metres for high voltage 1000V to 33kV, 6 metres for 33kV to 132kV, and 8 metres for transmission voltages above 132kV. These are minimum distances—best practice maintains greater clearances wherever possible. Work activities creating power line proximity hazards include elevated work platforms including boom lifts, cherry pickers, and scissor lifts extending into power line clearance zones; crane operations with booms, loads, or lifting tackle approaching power lines; scaffolding erection near power lines; ladder work where ladders or personnel could contact lines; vehicle operations including trucks, excavators, concrete pumps, and elevated platforms; materials handling including lifting or carrying long conductive objects such as pipes, steel reinforcement, or scaffold tubes that could contact lines; and building construction particularly multi-storey work where structures approach power line heights. Tree work, aerial work, and work on elevated structures regularly occur near overhead lines creating ongoing exposure. Electrical arcing occurs when high voltage electricity jumps across air gaps between energised conductors and grounded or lower-potential objects. This phenomenon means physical contact is not required for electrocution—approaching too close allows electricity to arc across the air gap. Arc distance increases with voltage: low voltage typically requires contact or very close proximity to arc; 11kV can arc up to 100mm; 22kV can arc up to 200mm; 33kV can arc up to 300mm; 66kV can arc approximately 600mm; and 132kV and above can arc over 1 metre. These arcing distances explain why minimum approach distances significantly exceed the theoretical arc gap—they provide safety margin accounting for equipment movement, conductor sway, and human error in distance estimation. Moisture including rain, humidity, or morning dew reduces air's insulating properties increasing arcing potential beyond dry weather distances. Power line contact scenarios occur through multiple mechanisms: elevated work platform booms extending into exclusion zones during building facade work or tree trimming; cranes swinging loads or booms near lines during lifting operations; vehicles with raised trays, tippers, or hydraulic equipment contacting lines during driving or tipping; ladders contacted with lines during positioning or while workers climb; long conductive materials such as scaffold tubes, steel reinforcement, pipes, or aluminium ladders touching lines during handling or lifting; and workers climbing structures or working on roofs approaching service entrance lines. The critical danger is that workers focused on their immediate task may not maintain awareness of power line locations, or may misjudge clearance distances particularly when viewing lines from oblique angles. Control measures following the hierarchy of control include elimination through requesting temporary power disconnection for the work duration, de-energising lines allowing work to proceed without electrical hazards; substitution through insulation or isolation where network operators install temporary insulation covers on conductors or establish isolated working zones with physical barriers; engineering controls including equipment height limiters preventing boom extension into exclusion zones, physical barriers preventing access to areas within minimum approach distances, and temporary support structures maintaining minimum clearances; administrative controls including exclusion zone marking, spotter personnel monitoring clearances, work permits requiring network operator approval, and worker training on power line hazards; and PPE including voltage-rated protective equipment for authorised electrical workers, though PPE alone is inadequate protection for construction workers near high-voltage lines. The hierarchy strongly favours elimination and engineering controls over administrative measures and PPE.

Create Custom Overhead Electric Lines SWMSDownload Sample SWMSView All Working at Height Documents

Fully editable, audit-ready, and aligned to Australian WHS standards.

Why this SWMS matters

Overhead power line electrocution incidents result in some of the most devastating fatalities in Australian construction, with Safe Work Australia data documenting regular deaths from power line contact across all states and territories. These incidents are characteristically catastrophic—high voltage electrocution typically causes immediate death through cardiac arrest, with survival rates poor even when emergency response is immediate. Workers who survive initial electrocution often suffer severe electrical burns requiring amputation, permanent neurological damage, psychological trauma, and life-changing disabilities. The brutal physics of electrical contact means that once current begins flowing through a worker's body, the muscular contractions prevent voluntary release from the electrical source, prolonging exposure and increasing injury severity. The consequences of power line contact extend to secondary victims attempting rescue. Ground workers who approach machinery or structures that have contacted power lines can become electrocution victims themselves through step potential or contact with energised surfaces. Emergency services personnel responding to power line incidents face extreme hazards requiring specialised training and equipment. Witnesses to electrocution incidents suffer psychological trauma from observing catastrophic injuries and deaths of colleagues. Families experience the incomprehensible loss of healthy workers who departed for work and never returned due to preventable electrical contact. Regulatory frameworks across Australian jurisdictions impose explicit duties regarding work near overhead power lines. State and territory electrical safety regulations including Queensland's Electrical Safety Regulation 2013, NSW Work Health and Safety Regulation 2017 Chapter 4 Part 4.5, Victoria's Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2017 Part 4.3, and equivalent provisions in other jurisdictions establish mandatory minimum approach distances, requirements for voltage identification, obligations to consult with network operators, and prohibitions on work within exclusion zones without authorisation. These regulations reflect that power line safety requires more than general WHS obligations—specific technical controls are mandated recognising the unique and severe hazards. Violation of electrical safety regulations attracts substantial penalties including immediate prohibition notices stopping all work, financial penalties exceeding $600,000 for individuals and $3 million for corporations, and criminal prosecution where fatalities occur. Recent prosecutions demonstrate courts' willingness to impose substantial penalties and custodial sentences for breaches resulting in electrocution deaths. Safe Work Method Statements for work near power lines provide essential documentation demonstrating systematic hazard identification and control. These documents prove that overhead lines were identified before work commenced, voltage was determined or conservatively assumed, minimum approach distances were established, control measures were implemented following the hierarchy, workers were trained in power line hazards, and supervision ensured compliance with exclusion zones. During WorkSafe investigations following electrocution incidents, comprehensive SWMS documentation is critical evidence of whether due diligence was exercised. Absence of power line assessment in work planning suggests inadequate hazard identification, whilst detailed SWMS demonstrates professional electrical safety management. Common errors contributing to power line electrocution include failing to identify overhead lines during site assessment and work planning; underestimating clearance distances particularly when viewing lines from oblique angles; assuming insulated appearance means lines are safe to approach—many overhead lines have weatherproofed covering that is not electrical insulation; using conductive materials near lines including metal ladders, scaffold tubes, steel reinforcement, and pipes that provide conduction paths; operating elevated work platforms or cranes without adequate clearance monitoring; working in wet weather when reduced insulation and increased arcing potential create additional hazards; and failing to establish exclusion zones or implement spotter procedures for work near power lines. Each error is preventable through proper planning, training, and implementation of control measures, yet they recur contributing to persistent electrocution incidents. Network operator consultation is frequently inadequate or omitted entirely, with contractors assuming they can maintain clearance through care and awareness without formal coordination with electrical utilities. However, network operators possess critical information about line voltage, configuration, loading, and can provide essential services including temporary disconnection, installation of insulation barriers, or provision of isolated working arrangements. Many electrocution incidents could have been prevented through early network operator engagement allowing elimination or engineering controls rather than relying on administrative measures and worker vigilance. Emergency response capabilities are often inadequate for power line contact scenarios. Workers and supervisors may not understand that remaining at safe distance and immediately contacting emergency services and the network operator is the appropriate response—attempting direct rescue of electrocution victims while lines remain energised creates additional casualties. Emergency response training specific to electrical contact incidents including maintaining clearances, preventing secondary victims, and coordinating with emergency services and network operators is essential but frequently absent from general emergency response training. The broader safety culture benefits when overhead power line work is managed systematically through comprehensive hazard identification, engagement with network operators, implementation of control measures following the hierarchy, worker training on electrical hazards, supervision ensuring exclusion zone compliance, and emergency preparedness for contact incidents. This systematic approach treats power lines as severe hazards requiring specialised management rather than routine site hazards addressed through general awareness and care.

Reinforce licensing, insurance, and regulator expectations for Overhead Electric Lines - Working Near Safe Work Method Statement crews before they mobilise.

Hazard identification

Surface the critical risks tied to this work scope and communicate them to every worker.

Risk register

Electrocution from Elevated Equipment Contact with Power Lines

High

Elevated work platforms, cranes, concrete pumps, elevated work platforms, cherry pickers, scissor lifts, and other equipment with extendable booms or elevated components contacting overhead power lines causes catastrophic electrocution incidents regularly across Australian construction sites. This hazard occurs when boom-type equipment extends into minimum approach distance exclusion zones, bringing conductors and equipment into proximity allowing electrical arcing, when operators focused on work positioning lose awareness of boom position relative to power lines, when wind moves extended booms reducing clearances that appeared adequate when stationary, when equipment works near building facades where service entrance lines may not be immediately obvious, and when clearances are assessed from ground level creating perception errors about actual boom-to-conductor distances at height. The physics of these incidents are brutal—when equipment contacts or approaches high-voltage lines, massive electrical current flows through the machine and any workers in contact with it. Workers in elevated platforms suffer immediate electrocution, whilst ground-level workers touching the energised machine become secondary victims. The equipment becomes an energised conductor creating an exclusion zone around the entire machine where step potential can electrocute persons approaching for rescue. Even after equipment contact ends, residual charge and induced voltage in the machine structure maintain electrocution risks until the line is confirmed de-energised.

Consequence: Immediate fatality from electrocution through cardiac arrest and severe electrical burns, workers in elevated platforms electrocuted when equipment contacts power lines, ground workers electrocuted when touching energised equipment, secondary electrocution of rescue personnel approaching energised equipment, and catastrophic electrical burns requiring amputation in survivors.

Contact with Power Lines During Long Object Handling or Lifting

High

Handling or lifting long conductive materials including scaffold tubes, steel reinforcement, aluminium ladders, metal pipes, sheet metal, and other elongated objects near overhead power lines creates electrocution risks as objects tilt or swing during handling bringing them into contact with conductors. This hazard is particularly insidious because workers handling materials at ground level may not observe the elevated end of materials approaching power lines. Common scenarios include scaffold tubes or pipes being carried vertically by workers who tilt them upright without observing overhead clearances; steel reinforcement bundles being lifted by cranes where the reinforcement length exceeds boom clearance creating contact even when the crane maintains distance; ladders being raised into position contacting lines before workers realise proximity; sheet materials acting as sails in wind during lifting causing uncontrolled swing into power lines; and workers passing materials up to elevated positions where the transfer arc brings materials within power line exclusion zones. The conductivity of metal materials provides direct current path to ground through workers handling the objects—when the elevated end contacts power lines, electrical current flows through the material and through workers at the lower end causing electrocution. Even non-metallic materials when wet can conduct sufficient current to cause electrocution.

Consequence: Electrocution of workers handling conductive materials that contact power lines, multiple simultaneous casualties when several workers are handling same material, electrical burns to hands and contact points where current enters and exits body, and secondary electrocution of rescue personnel approaching electrified materials.

Misjudgment of Clearance Distances from Oblique Viewing Angles

High

Visual assessment of clearance distances between equipment, materials, or structures and overhead power lines is notoriously inaccurate, particularly when viewing from oblique angles or from ground level assessing elevated clearances. This perceptual error causes workers and operators to believe adequate clearance exists when actual distances are within or approaching the minimum approach distance exclusion zone. The phenomenon occurs because depth perception is poor when viewing linear conductors against sky backgrounds without reference points, parallax effects make distances appear greater when viewed from angles rather than perpendicular, foreshortening from ground-level viewpoints compresses apparent vertical separations, and power lines at different heights on the same pole structure create confusing visual relationships. Operators in elevated platform baskets or crane cabs have different viewing perspectives than ground-based spotters, leading to clearance assessment discrepancies. Atmospheric conditions including haze, bright sunlight creating glare, and dusk lighting reduce visibility of conductors making clearance assessment even more difficult. The consequences of misjudgment are not gradual—equipment either maintains safe clearance or violates the exclusion zone with immediate electrocution risk, providing no progressive warning as limits are approached.

Consequence: Electrocution when equipment or materials believed to have adequate clearance actually violate minimum approach distances, delayed recognition of hazard as clearance is progressively reduced, sudden catastrophic outcomes when misjudged clearances result in power line contact, and false confidence from successful operations creating normalisation until incident occurs.

Assumption that Insulated-Appearing Lines are Safe to Approach

High

Many overhead power line conductors have weatherproofed coverings or appear to be insulated, creating dangerous misconceptions that these lines are safe to approach or contact. This hazard stems from fundamental misunderstanding that most overhead line coverings are weatherproofing to prevent conductor corrosion and are not electrical insulation rated for the voltages being carried. True insulated cables exist in some installations, but distinguishing insulated cables from weatherproofed conductors requires expertise most construction workers lack. The visual similarity between weatherproof coating and insulation leads workers to assume that black-covered conductors are safely insulated, that lines connecting to buildings are low-voltage insulated services, and that newer-appearing lines must be insulated for safety. This false security causes workers to violate minimum approach distances believing the insulation provides protection, to contact lines directly during maintenance or construction assuming insulation prevents electrocution, and to work near lines without implementing proper controls. Even genuinely insulated cables can have damaged insulation from weather exposure, animal contact, or previous damage that is not visible from ground level. Relying on insulation appearance rather than maintaining proper clearances has resulted in numerous electrocution fatalities where workers contacted lines they believed were safely insulated.

Consequence: Electrocution when workers contact lines believed to be safely insulated but are actually energised conductors with weatherproofing only, false security leading to clearance violations and inadequate control measures, multiple workers potentially affected as misconception spreads through work crew, and catastrophic outcomes from direct contact with high-voltage conductors.

Inadequate Exclusion Zone Establishment and Monitoring

High

Work proceeding near overhead power lines without properly established and monitored exclusion zones creates conditions where equipment, materials, or workers can inadvertently violate minimum approach distances. This control failure manifests when exclusion zones are not physically marked preventing visual recognition of boundaries, when spotter personnel are not assigned to continuously monitor clearances, when work sequences allow equipment or materials to approach power lines without active clearance management, when multiple activities proceed simultaneously creating distraction from clearance monitoring, when workers are not trained to recognise when they are approaching exclusion zones, and when supervision is inadequate to ensure exclusion zone compliance. The absence of physical exclusion zone markers means workers must mentally maintain awareness of an invisible boundary whilst focused on work tasks—human attention limitations make this unreliable. Spotter absence means no dedicated person is watching clearances continuously, allowing operators and workers to concentrate on immediate work whilst clearance inadvertently reduces. Work complexity and time pressure override safety awareness as workers focus on productivity over clearance maintenance.

Consequence: Progressive clearance reduction as work proceeds without monitoring creating eventual power line contact, sudden violations when equipment swings or materials move unexpectedly, normalisation of working near power lines without formal controls until incident occurs, and catastrophic electrocution when inadequate controls fail to prevent contact.

Emergency Response Errors Creating Secondary Electrocution Victims

High

Inappropriate emergency response following power line contact incidents creates secondary electrocution casualties when rescue personnel approach energised equipment or attempt to assist electrocution victims whilst electrical hazards remain. This occurs when workers rush to assist colleagues who have been electrocuted without recognising that equipment or structures remain energised, when ground personnel touch equipment that has contacted power lines attempting to move it or provide access for rescue, when step potential around energised equipment electrocutes persons approaching within several metres, when well-intentioned rescue attempts occur before power lines are confirmed de-energised by network operators, and when emergency services personnel arrive and attempt immediate patient access without electrical safety assessment. The human instinct to immediately assist injured colleagues conflicts with electrical safety requirements to maintain distance and wait for electrical hazards to be eliminated. Power line contact may appear to have ended when equipment separates from conductors, but residual charge, induced voltages, and possibility of re-contact during ongoing work create continued electrocution risks. Ground potential rise around equipment contact points creates invisible hazard zones where the ground surface itself carries dangerous voltage gradients—persons walking in these zones experience step potential as current flows through one leg to the other via the torso and heart.

Consequence: Secondary electrocution of rescue personnel attempting to assist initial victims, multiple casualties from single incident as rescue attempts create additional victims, step potential electrocution of personnel approaching energised equipment, delayed medical response as emergency services cannot safely access victims until power is confirmed off, and psychological trauma to witnesses unable to assist without creating additional casualties.

Control measures

Deploy layered controls aligned to the hierarchy of hazard management.

Implementation guide

Pre-Work Power Line Identification and Voltage Determination

Elimination

Systematic identification of all overhead power lines before work commences enables implementation of appropriate control measures and supports elimination through requesting temporary disconnection. This control requires conducting site assessment walking entire work area to identify overhead lines, documenting power line locations on site plans showing conductor positions relative to work areas, identifying network operator through visible markings on poles or enquiry to local electrical utility, requesting voltage confirmation from network operator for all identified lines, and determining minimum approach distances based on confirmed or conservatively assumed voltages. Never rely on visual assessment to determine voltage—confirm with network operator or assume high voltage requiring maximum clearances. Assessment should identify not only obvious major transmission or distribution lines but also service entrance connections to buildings, temporary construction power lines, and communications lines sharing poles with power conductors. Documentation creates records of what was identified and what controls were implemented.

Implementation

1. Develop site assessment procedure requiring overhead power line identification before any work commences, with assessment documented on site plans. 2. Provide training on power line identification including how to recognise conductors, distinguish power lines from communications lines, and identify pole markings indicating network operators. 3. Establish relationships with local network operators (Ausgrid, Endeavour, Essential Energy, Energex, Ergon, SA Power Networks, Western Power, etc.) for voltage confirmation and service requests. 4. Require documented voltage confirmation from network operators before work near any overhead lines, with assumption of high voltage if confirmation is not obtained. 5. Mark power line locations on site plans with exclusion zones shown at appropriate minimum approach distances based on confirmed or assumed voltage. 6. Implement work planning procedures requiring power line identification and control measure selection before work methods are finalised. 7. Conduct site induction highlighting overhead power line locations, voltages, exclusion zones, and control measures for all workers before site access.

Request Temporary Power Disconnection or Isolation for Work Duration

Elimination

Requesting electrical network operators to temporarily de-energise or isolate power lines for work duration eliminates electrical hazards allowing work to proceed without electrocution risks. This elimination-level control is the most effective protection and should be the first option considered for any work near power lines. Network operators can disconnect lines feeding specific areas, install isolation devices creating isolated working zones, or rearrange supply through alternative circuits allowing specific lines to be de-energised whilst maintaining supply to customers through different routes. Disconnection requests should be submitted well in advance as network operators require time to plan outages, notify affected customers, and arrange resources. Work scheduling must accommodate network operator timeframes and outage durations. Verification that lines are de-energised through network operator confirmation is essential before work commences within clearance zones. This control is most practical for work of several hours to several days duration where the substantial safety improvement justifies disconnection arrangements.

Implementation

1. Establish early engagement with network operators during project planning identifying work that will occur near power lines and requesting disconnection options. 2. Develop disconnection request procedures including required notice periods (typically 10 business days minimum), application forms, work description, and duration requirements. 3. Schedule work activities near power lines to accommodate network operator outage availability, clustering work during planned disconnection periods. 4. Require network operator written confirmation of disconnection including time power will be off, time power will be restored, and visible isolation points. 5. Implement lock-out tag-out procedures in conjunction with network operators to prevent inadvertent re-energisation during work. 6. Train workers that de-energised lines must still be treated as potentially live until confirmed de-energised, and to maintain safe approach practices. 7. Conduct post-work coordination with network operators confirming work is complete and lines can be re-energised safely without risk to workers or equipment remaining on site.

Physical Exclusion Zone Barriers and Height Limiters

Engineering

Installing physical barriers preventing access to areas within minimum approach distances and fitting equipment with height limiters preventing boom extension into exclusion zones provides engineering-level protection that does not rely on continuous worker vigilance. Physical barriers including barricading, temporary fencing, or installed warning structures mark exclusion zone boundaries making them visible and tangible rather than imaginary lines requiring mental tracking. Height limiting devices on elevated work platforms, cranes, and aerial equipment provide mechanical prevention of boom extension into power line proximity, with systems including proximity warning alarms, automatic boom stop mechanisms, and physical limiters preventing operation beyond set heights or radii. Tiger tails (high-visibility marker balls) or bunting installed on conductors improve power line visibility particularly for crane operators and elevated platform workers. Insulation barriers or shields installed by network operators on conductors provide protection against accidental brief contact though are not sufficient alone without maintaining approach distances.

Implementation

1. Install physical barriers including barricade fencing, bunting, or warning structures at ground level marking exclusion zone boundaries around power line areas. 2. Fit elevated work platforms and cranes operating near power lines with proximity warning systems providing audible and visual alerts when approaching preset clearance limits. 3. Install height limiting devices on boom equipment mechanically preventing extension beyond heights that would violate clearances to identified power lines. 4. Request network operators to install high-visibility marker balls (tiger tails) on conductors in work areas improving power line visibility from operating positions. 5. Where appropriate and available, request network operators to install temporary insulation covers on conductors providing additional protection against brief contact. 6. Implement signage at exclusion zone boundaries warning of overhead power line hazards and minimum approach distance requirements. 7. Maintain barriers and warning devices throughout work duration with daily inspection ensuring they remain in place and functional.

Dedicated Spotter Personnel for Continuous Clearance Monitoring

Administrative

Assigning dedicated spotter personnel to continuously monitor clearance between equipment, materials, or workers and overhead power lines provides active human oversight ensuring minimum approach distances are maintained throughout operations. Spotters must be trained in power line hazards, minimum approach distance requirements, viewing angles and parallax effects affecting clearance assessment, communication methods with operators and workers, and authority to stop work immediately if clearances are compromised. The spotter's sole responsibility during operations is clearance monitoring—they do not participate in work activities or have other duties that would divide attention. Effective spotting requires positioning with clear unobstructed view of both the power lines and equipment/materials, using measurement aids such as known-dimension reference points when assessing clearances, maintaining constant communication with operators, and exercising stop authority immediately if clearance margins are uncertain. Two-way communication systems (radios) ensure reliable contact between spotters and operators.

Implementation

1. Establish spotter requirements for all work near overhead power lines where equipment or materials will operate within two times the minimum approach distance. 2. Train spotter personnel on power line hazards, voltage-specific minimum approach distances, clearance assessment techniques, and communication procedures. 3. Provide high-visibility vests or clothing identifying spotters and positioning them for optimal viewing of both power lines and equipment. 4. Equip spotters and operators with two-way radios or reliable communication systems ensuring immediate contact. 5. Require spotter pre-operation briefing with operators and workers covering power line locations, minimum approach distances, communication signals, and emergency stop procedures. 6. Implement spotter authority policies establishing that spotter stop commands require immediate compliance without question or delay. 7. Maintain continuous spotter presence throughout all operations near power lines with replacement spotters if operations extend beyond single shift or if breaks are required.

Conservative Approach Distance Application and Work Restrictions

Administrative

Implementing conservative approach distances exceeding regulatory minimums and restricting work methods near power lines provides additional safety margins accounting for uncertainties in voltage, clearance measurement, equipment movement, and environmental factors. This control establishes organisational approach distances greater than regulatory minimums (for example, using 5-metre clearances for lines where 3-metre regulatory minimum applies), prohibits certain high-risk activities near power lines including long object handling or lifting within extended clearance zones, restricts work during adverse weather including high winds causing conductor movement or rain reducing insulation, requires equipment positioning that maintains clearances even accounting for maximum boom extension and load swing, and implements step-back requirements where any uncertainty about clearances requires additional distance or cessation of work pending verification. These conservative practices acknowledge that the consequences of approach distance violations are so severe that operating at minimum clearances leaves inadequate margin for the inevitable uncertainties and errors in real-world operations.

Implementation

1. Establish organisational minimum approach distances exceeding regulatory requirements, documented in company safety procedures and work instructions. 2. Prohibit handling of long conductive materials including scaffold tubes, reinforcement, pipes, and ladders within twice the minimum approach distance of power lines. 3. Implement weather restrictions prohibiting work near power lines when wind speeds exceed thresholds creating conductor movement or when rain reduces visibility and insulation. 4. Require equipment positioning plans showing maximum reach envelopes do not intersect exclusion zones accounting for boom extension, load swing, and equipment movement. 5. Establish step-back procedures requiring work stoppage and clearance verification whenever any uncertainty about distances exists. 6. Provide measurement tools including laser distance meters allowing accurate clearance verification rather than visual estimation. 7. Conduct toolbox meetings before work near power lines emphasising conservative approach distances and immediate stop authority if clearances are uncertain.

Comprehensive Emergency Response Procedures for Power Line Contact

Administrative

Establishing specific emergency procedures for power line contact incidents prevents secondary casualties and ensures appropriate response when contact occurs. These procedures must address immediate actions including stopping all work and evacuating area around contacted equipment maintaining safe distances, calling emergency services (000) and network operator reporting power line contact and location, preventing access to energised equipment or structures by any personnel until confirmed de-energised by network operator, establishing perimeter preventing entry within 10 metres of contacted equipment due to step potential hazards, and providing information to emergency services about power line contact so electrical rescue procedures can be implemented. Procedures must emphasise that well-intentioned rescue attempts are the primary cause of secondary electrocution casualties, and that maintaining safe distance while arranging professional electrical emergency response is the correct action. Training must address scenarios including workers trapped in elevated platforms on energised equipment, ground-level workers tempted to touch energised machinery, and bystanders approaching incident scenes unaware of electrical hazards.

Implementation

1. Develop power line contact emergency procedures specific to electrical incidents, distinct from general emergency response procedures. 2. Train all workers on electrical emergency response including immediate evacuation, maintaining safe distances, calling emergency services and network operators, and preventing rescue attempts. 3. Post emergency contact information prominently on site including network operator 24-hour emergency numbers for each electrical utility in the area. 4. Conduct emergency drills simulating power line contact scenarios, practicing evacuation, communication, perimeter establishment, and response coordination. 5. Provide emergency response cards or pocket guides summarising key actions for power line contact incidents. 6. Brief emergency services during project establishment about potential power line hazards and locations of overhead lines on site. 7. Establish communication protocols ensuring incident information including power line contact, voltage if known, and equipment involved is conveyed to emergency services and network operators.

Download complete control procedures

Personal protective equipment

High-Visibility Clothing

Requirement: Class D Day/Night vest or coveralls compliant with AS/NZS 4602.1

When: Required during all work near overhead power lines to ensure spotter personnel and operators can clearly see workers in exclusion zones or approaching boundaries. Particularly critical for spotter identification and worker visibility from elevated operating positions.

Hard Hat with Chin Strap

Requirement: Type 1 helmet compliant with AS/NZS 1801

When: Mandatory during work near overhead power lines particularly when working from elevated positions or under power lines. Provides limited protection against minor contact but primary function is head protection from other construction hazards.

Safety Boots with Non-Conductive Soles

Requirement: Steel toe cap boots certified to AS/NZS 2210.3 with non-conductive soles and heels

When: Required during all work near power lines providing foot protection and limited electrical insulation. Note that boots provide minimal protection against high-voltage contact and are not primary electrical protection.

Insulated Gloves

Requirement: Voltage-rated insulated gloves compliant with AS/NZS 2225 for authorised electrical workers only

When: Required only for authorised electrical workers conducting work on or near energised conductors. NOT appropriate protection for construction workers near power lines who must maintain approach distances rather than relying on PPE.

Safety Glasses

Requirement: Impact-rated to AS/NZS 1337.1 with UV protection

When: Required during work activities to protect against construction hazards including debris, dust, and UV exposure particularly when working in elevated positions with increased sun exposure.

Inspections & checks

Before work starts

  • ✓Identify all overhead power lines within and adjacent to work area through systematic site walk-around and review of site plans
  • ✓Determine voltage of identified power lines through network operator confirmation or conservative assumption of high voltage
  • ✓Calculate minimum approach distances for each identified power line based on confirmed or assumed voltage levels
  • ✓Mark exclusion zones on site plans and physically on ground where equipment or work will occur near power lines
  • ✓Verify network operator has been contacted regarding temporary disconnection, isolation, or isolation arrangements where work will occur near lines
  • ✓Confirm spotter personnel are assigned, trained, and equipped with communication systems for clearance monitoring operations
  • ✓Check height limiting devices or proximity warning systems on equipment are functional and set for correct clearances
  • ✓Conduct toolbox meeting briefing all workers and operators on power line locations, voltages, exclusion zones, and emergency procedures

During work

  • ✓Maintain continuous spotter monitoring of clearances between equipment, materials, workers and overhead power lines throughout operations
  • ✓Verify minimum approach distances are maintained with conservative safety margins accounting for equipment movement and conductor sway
  • ✓Monitor weather conditions including wind causing conductor movement or rain reducing visibility and insulation requiring work cessation
  • ✓Observe equipment operators and workers for awareness of power line locations and compliance with exclusion zone boundaries
  • ✓Check physical barriers and warning devices around exclusion zones remain in place and visible throughout work period
  • ✓Ensure communication systems between spotters and operators remain functional with immediate stop capability if clearances are compromised
  • ✓Watch for any changes in work sequence or methods that could introduce power line proximity risks not identified during planning

After work

  • ✓Verify all equipment, materials, and workers have cleared exclusion zones before demobilisation or shift change
  • ✓Remove or secure physical barriers around power line exclusion zones preventing access during non-work periods
  • ✓Document any clearance incidents, near-misses, or close approaches to power lines that occurred during work for investigation and improvement
  • ✓Conduct debrief with workers and operators reviewing power line safety performance and identifying any procedural improvements
  • ✓Report to network operator if work complete if temporary isolation or disconnection arrangements were in place allowing re-energisation

Step-by-step work procedure

Give supervisors and crews a clear, auditable sequence for the task.

Field ready
1

Conduct Site Assessment and Identify All Overhead Power Lines

Before any work planning or mobilisation, conduct comprehensive site assessment specifically identifying all overhead power lines in and adjacent to the work area. Walk the entire site systematically observing overhead spaces for power line conductors. Look up continuously whilst walking—many power lines are missed because workers focus on ground-level hazards. Identify not only major transmission and distribution lines on large pole structures but also smaller service entrance connections to buildings, temporary construction power, and lines that may cross the site at peripheries. Use binoculars if necessary to identify conductors at distance or height. Take photographs documenting power line locations and positions relative to work areas. Mark all identified power line locations on site plans including conductor heights, span directions, and pole positions. Identify network operators from markings visible on pole structures or through enquiry to local electrical utilities. Create register of all identified power lines documenting locations, apparent voltages based on configuration, and network operators. This comprehensive identification ensures no power lines are overlooked during subsequent control measure planning.

Safety considerations

Thorough power line identification is the foundation of all subsequent controls—lines not identified during assessment cannot be controlled during work. Many electrocution incidents result from failing to identify all power lines particularly service connections and lower-voltage distribution lines that are less obvious than major transmission lines. Assume any elevated conductor is an energised power line unless definitively confirmed otherwise. Weather conditions including overcast skies or bright sunlight affecting visibility may require assessment under different lighting conditions to ensure all lines are identified.

2

Determine Voltage and Minimum Approach Distances

For each identified power line, determine the voltage being carried to establish appropriate minimum approach distances. Contact network operators providing power line locations and requesting voltage confirmation. Network operators maintain records of all line voltages and can provide definitive information. Allow adequate time for response as network operator enquiries may take several days to process. If voltage confirmation cannot be obtained or if timely response is not possible, conservatively assume high voltage requiring maximum approach distances. Never attempt to visually estimate voltage from conductor size, pole configuration, or insulator appearance—these indicators are unreliable. Based on confirmed or conservatively assumed voltage, determine minimum approach distance requirements from state or territory electrical safety regulations. Standard approach distances for untrained workers include 1 metre for low voltage up to 1000V, 3 metres for 1000V to 33kV, 6 metres for 33kV to 132kV, and 8 metres for 132kV and above. Record voltage determinations and minimum approach distances in site documentation for reference during work planning and execution.

Safety considerations

Voltage determination must be conservative—if any uncertainty exists about voltage, assume the highest voltage requiring maximum approach distances. Visual voltage estimation is dangerously unreliable and has contributed to many electrocution incidents where workers underestimated voltage and violated approach distances. Network operator confirmation provides the only reliable voltage information. Minimum approach distances are absolute requirements not guidelines—violations create immediate electrocution risk through electrical arcing even without physical contact.

3

Establish and Mark Physical Exclusion Zones

Using determined minimum approach distances, establish exclusion zones around all identified power lines and mark these zones both on site plans and physically on the ground. Exclusion zones extend the minimum approach distance in all directions from conductors creating three-dimensional volumes where no person, equipment, material, or any object may enter. On site plans, draw exclusion zone boundaries around power line locations using appropriate scale. At ground level, physically mark exclusion zones using barricade tape, fencing, painted lines, or warning signs positioned at the minimum approach distance perimeter. For power lines crossing work areas overhead, mark the ground projection of exclusion zones establishing no-go areas beneath and around conductors. Install highly visible markers that are obvious to workers, operators, and visitors. Consider that exclusion zones exist in three dimensions—ground markings show lateral boundaries but height restrictions also apply for elevated equipment, materials handling, and scaffolding. Post signage at exclusion zone boundaries warning of overhead power line hazards, stating voltage if known, and showing minimum approach distance requirements. Ensure markings remain visible and in place throughout work duration with daily inspection and replacement if damaged.

Safety considerations

Physical exclusion zone marking makes invisible electrical hazard boundaries visible and tangible, significantly improving worker awareness and compliance compared to relying on mental tracking of imaginary boundaries. Markings must account for equipment reach—an excavator operating outside marked boundaries may still violate clearances if its boom or bucket extends into exclusion zones. Three-dimensional thinking is critical as exclusion zones extend vertically as well as horizontally. Markers must remain in place and visible throughout work—damaged, removed, or faded markers provide no protection.

4

Request Network Operator Disconnection or Isolation Services

For work that will occur near power lines or where maintaining exclusion zones is difficult due to work proximity, contact network operators requesting temporary power line disconnection, isolation, or provision of isolated working arrangements. Submit disconnection requests well in advance (typically minimum 10 business days) providing work descriptions, locations, durations, and requested disconnection periods. Network operators will assess feasibility, notify affected customers if disconnection will interrupt supply, and schedule outages accommodating both work requirements and network operational needs. Negotiate timing that aligns with work schedules whilst respecting network operator constraints. Obtain written confirmation of disconnection including date, time power will be off, time power will be restored, visible isolation points, and confirmation procedures. On scheduled disconnection date, verify with network operator that lines are confirmed de-energised before any work within clearance zones commences. Implement lock-out tag-out procedures in conjunction with network operators preventing inadvertent re-energisation. Coordinate work completion timing with network operators ensuring lines can be re-energised on schedule. Where disconnection is not possible, request network operators to install insulation barriers, tiger tails, or other services improving safety margins.

Safety considerations

Temporary disconnection eliminates electrical hazards providing the highest level of protection and should always be the first option considered. Network operator engagement requires early planning and adequate notice—last-minute disconnection requests cannot typically be accommodated. Never assume lines are de-energised based solely on absence of load or visible isolation—verify de-energisation through network operator confirmation following formal isolation procedures. Treat de-energised lines as potentially live until confirmation is received and maintained throughout work duration.

5

Assign and Brief Spotter Personnel for Clearance Monitoring

For work near power lines where equipment or materials will operate within conservative clearance margins, assign dedicated spotter personnel to continuously monitor minimum approach distance compliance. Select spotters who understand power line hazards, possess good spatial awareness and judgment, and can assert stop authority confidently. Provide spotter training covering minimum approach distances for different voltages, clearance assessment techniques accounting for parallax and perspective errors, communication methods and radio operation, emergency stop signals and procedures, and limitations of visual distance estimation. Equip spotters with high-visibility vests or clothing, two-way radios or communication systems with operators, and reference materials showing minimum approach distances for quick reference. Position spotters with unobstructed views of both power lines and equipment or materials whose clearances they will monitor. Conduct pre-operation briefings between spotters, operators, and workers covering power line locations, exclusion zone boundaries, minimum approach distances, communication signals including normal operation and emergency stop commands, and roles and responsibilities. Ensure operators understand that spotter stop commands require immediate compliance without delay or question. Maintain continuous spotter presence throughout operations with replacement spotters available if operations extend across shifts.

Safety considerations

Spotter effectiveness depends on clear authority and operator compliance—establish unambiguous rules that spotter stop commands are immediately obeyed. Spotters cannot reliably monitor clearances whilst performing other duties—dedicated attention to clearance monitoring is essential. Position spotters to avoid parallax errors where viewing angles create clearance perception errors. Provide communication systems reliable in construction noise environments. Train spotters that if clearance is uncertain, immediate stop is the correct response—never allow operations to continue when clearance is doubtful.

6

Implement Equipment Height Limiters and Proximity Warnings

For elevated work platforms, cranes, and aerial equipment operating near power lines, install or activate height limiting devices and proximity warning systems preventing boom extension into exclusion zones. Height limiters are mechanical or electronic systems that prevent boom elevation or extension beyond preset limits programmed based on power line locations and minimum approach distances. Configure limiters accounting for equipment position relative to power lines, boom reach envelopes at various extensions, and minimum approach distance requirements. Test height limiter operation before work commences verifying boom stops occur at intended limits and cannot be overridden without authorised intervention. Install proximity warning systems providing audible and visual alerts when equipment approaches preset clearance thresholds, typically set at twice the minimum approach distance to provide advance warning. Train operators on height limiter and warning system operation, understanding that systems provide backup protection but operators remain responsible for maintaining clearances through active awareness. Request network operators to install tiger tails (high-visibility marker balls) on conductors in work areas improving line visibility from operating positions. These engineering controls provide protection that does not rely solely on operator vigilance and spotter monitoring.

Safety considerations

Height limiters and proximity warnings are highly effective controls but can fail through incorrect programming, mechanical defects, or deliberate override. Never rely exclusively on these systems without maintaining spotter monitoring and operator awareness. Test systems before each work shift verifying functionality. Ensure operators understand that warning alarms require immediate response to assess clearance and implement corrective actions rather than continuing operation. Height limiters prevent vertical approach but may not prevent lateral encroachment if equipment swings or extends horizontally into exclusion zones requiring three-dimensional clearance awareness.

7

Conduct Work Maintaining Conservative Clearances and Emergency Readiness

With all control measures implemented, proceed with work activities maintaining constant awareness of power line locations and continuous compliance with minimum approach distances. Operators and workers must visually check power line clearances regularly, respond immediately to spotter warnings or proximity alarms, maintain conservative clearances with additional margins beyond minimums accounting for equipment movement and uncertainty, and stop work immediately if any doubt exists about clearance adequacy. Avoid rapid equipment movements or sudden direction changes that could bring equipment into exclusion zones before operators can respond. Never attempt to squeeze through marginal clearances or operate at minimum distances assuming precision control. Monitor weather conditions ceasing work if wind causes conductor movement or rain reduces visibility and insulation properties. Maintain emergency readiness throughout work with immediate access to emergency numbers for network operators and emergency services, clear understanding of emergency procedures if power line contact occurs, and continuous awareness of evacuation routes and assembly points. If power line contact occurs, implement emergency procedures immediately: stop all work, evacuate maintaining distance from contacted equipment, call emergency services and network operators, establish perimeter preventing access, and wait for network operator confirmation that lines are de-energised before any rescue or recovery activities.

Safety considerations

Maintaining clearances requires continuous vigilance as work complexity and time pressure naturally draw attention away from power line hazards. Conservative clearances provide safety margins for the inevitable moments when attention lapses or unexpected equipment movements occur. Emergency preparedness is critical because even with comprehensive controls, contact incidents can occur—rapid appropriate response prevents secondary casualties and enables effective rescue once electrical hazards are eliminated. Never allow operational tempo or productivity pressure to override clearance maintenance—every electrocution incident begins with a decision to accept marginal clearances or proceed despite uncertainty.

Get risk assessment & procedures

Frequently asked questions

How do I determine the voltage of overhead power lines on my work site?

The only reliable method to determine overhead power line voltage is to obtain confirmation from the electrical network operator who owns and operates the lines. Visual assessment of voltage is dangerously unreliable and has contributed to numerous electrocution incidents where workers underestimated line voltage. To obtain voltage confirmation, first identify the network operator which may be marked on pole structures or can be determined through enquiry to your state or territory electrical safety regulator or local council. Network operators in Australia include Ausgrid, Endeavour Energy, and Essential Energy in NSW; Energex and Ergon in Queensland; Jemena, AusNet Services, Powercor, United Energy, and CitiPower in Victoria; SA Power Networks in South Australia; Western Power in Western Australia; TasNetworks in Tasmania; and Evoenergy in ACT. Contact the relevant network operator providing the location of power lines (street address or GPS coordinates) and describing the proposed work. Network operators maintain comprehensive records of all line voltages and can provide definitive confirmation typically within several business days. Some network operators provide online enquiry systems allowing voltage confirmation requests to be submitted electronically. If voltage confirmation cannot be obtained within work timeframes, or if any uncertainty exists about which lines the confirmation applies to, you must conservatively assume high voltage and apply maximum minimum approach distances—typically 6 metres for voltages that might be anywhere from 11kV to 132kV. Never use visual indicators including conductor size, number of insulators, pole height, or any other physical characteristics to estimate voltage as these correlations are unreliable and vary between network operators and installation vintages. The visual appearance of insulation or weatherproofing on conductors does not indicate voltage or reduce approach distance requirements. When requesting voltage confirmation, allow adequate time—submit requests during project planning phase rather than waiting until work is imminent. Provide clear location information and description of proposed work as network operators may offer additional assistance including temporary disconnection or installation of protective barriers if work will occur near lines. Maintain records of voltage confirmation correspondence as evidence of due diligence in work planning. Remember that assuming high voltage when confirmation is unavailable provides greater safety margins and is always the appropriate conservative approach when any doubt exists about power line voltage.

What are the minimum clearance distances I must maintain from overhead power lines?

Minimum approach distances from overhead power lines are legally mandated under state and territory electrical safety regulations and vary based on the voltage of the conductors. For persons without electrical training or authorisation (which includes all construction workers except authorised electrical workers), the standard minimum approach distances are: 1 metre clearance for low voltage lines up to 1000 volts (typical residential and light commercial supply); 3 metres clearance for high voltage lines from 1000 volts to 33,000 volts (common distribution voltages including 11kV and 22kV); 6 metres clearance for extra high voltage lines from 33,000 volts to 132,000 volts; and 8 metres or more for ultra high voltage transmission lines above 132,000 volts. These distances must be maintained by any part of the worker's body, any equipment being used, any load or material being handled, any vehicle or plant, and any structure or installation. The distances represent absolute minimums below which electrical arcing can occur causing electrocution without physical contact—high voltage electricity can jump across air gaps, making proximity alone potentially fatal. Best practice maintains clearances significantly greater than these regulatory minimums to provide safety margins accounting for equipment movement, conductor sway in wind, measurement uncertainty, and human error. Many organisations implement conservative approach distances exceeding regulatory minimums—for example, maintaining 5-metre clearances for lines where 3-metre regulatory minimum applies. The consequences of violating minimum approach distances are so severe (immediate electrocution and likely fatality) that operating at minimum limits leaves inadequate margin for real-world uncertainties. Important considerations affecting approach distances include wind causing conductor movement that can reduce clearances even when equipment appears stationary; equipment swing or boom extension creating dynamic clearance changes requiring assessment at maximum reach not just current position; multiple conductors at different heights on the same pole structure where minimum approach distance must be maintained from all conductors including those at varying elevations; and deteriorating weather including rain reducing insulation properties and increasing arcing potential beyond dry weather distances. Minimum approach distances apply in three dimensions—both horizontal and vertical clearances must be maintained, not just lateral separation. When working near power lines, implement spotter monitoring, physical exclusion zone barriers, and height limiting devices rather than relying on visual distance estimation which is notoriously inaccurate particularly when viewing from oblique angles. If any uncertainty exists about whether adequate clearance can be maintained, request network operator assistance including temporary disconnection or installation of protective barriers. Never gamble with marginal clearances—the cost of temporary power disconnection or alternative access methods is infinitesimal compared to the human cost of electrocution incidents.

What should I do if equipment or materials contact overhead power lines?

If equipment or materials contact or come within close proximity of overhead power lines, immediate appropriate response is critical to prevent fatalities and secondary electrocution casualties. The correct emergency response procedure is: immediately stop all work and equipment operation; if you are in an elevated platform or cab of contacted equipment, remain inside if safe to do so as the equipment cab may provide some insulation—do not exit unless there is immediate life threat such as fire; if you must exit contacted equipment, jump clear landing with both feet together and shuffle away maintaining both feet in contact with ground (never take large steps as this creates step potential electrocution risk); immediately call emergency services (000) reporting power line contact, equipment involved, location, and whether anyone is injured; call the network operator's 24-hour emergency number reporting the power line contact—all network operators have emergency response numbers for power line incidents; evacuate all personnel maintaining minimum 10 metres distance from contacted equipment or structures due to step potential creating dangerous voltage gradients in surrounding ground; establish perimeter using barricades, tape, or assigned personnel preventing anyone from approaching the incident scene; do not attempt any rescue of injured persons until network operator confirms power lines are de-energised—well-intentioned rescue attempts are the primary cause of secondary electrocution deaths; wait for network operator to arrive, confirm de-energisation, and authorise access to equipment before any approach; only after network operator confirmation that power is off should emergency services or rescue personnel approach to provide medical care or extrication. Critical points to understand: equipment that has contacted power lines remains energised and deadly to touch even after visible contact ends—residual charge and induced voltages persist until lines are confirmed off; step potential around energised equipment creates invisible hazard zones extending many metres where the ground surface itself carries dangerous voltage—persons walking in these zones experience current flow from foot to foot through the body and heart; attempting immediate rescue before power is confirmed off has caused many secondary electrocution deaths of co-workers and emergency responders; remaining in elevated platforms on contacted equipment, while counter-intuitive, may be safer than exiting if the platform structure provides some protection and the alternative is jumping into step potential zones; and network operator response may take 30-60 minutes or longer, requiring injured persons and witnesses to wait under extremely stressful circumstances—this delay is necessary because rescue cannot proceed safely until electrical hazards are eliminated. Train all workers in these emergency procedures before work near power lines commences, conduct emergency drills practicing response to contact scenarios, post network operator emergency numbers prominently on site, and brief emergency services during project establishment about potential power line hazards. The human instinct to immediately assist injured colleagues must be overridden by understanding that approaching energised equipment creates additional casualties without helping the initial victim—maintaining distance and coordinating professional electrical emergency response saves lives in power line contact incidents.

Can I work safely near power lines if I use non-conductive materials and wear rubber boots?

No, using non-conductive materials and wearing rubber boots or other personal protective equipment does not provide adequate protection allowing safe work near overhead power lines in violation of minimum approach distances. This misconception has contributed to numerous electrocution fatalities where workers believed PPE or non-conductive materials eliminated electrical risks. The reality is that high-voltage electricity can arc across air gaps making physical contact unnecessary for electrocution—approaching within arcing distance allows current to jump through air regardless of material conductivity or PPE worn. Standard construction PPE including rubber boots, gloves, and insulated tools are not rated for protection against high-voltage power line exposure. Rubber boots provide minimal electrical resistance that is overwhelmed by high-voltage power line currents measured in thousands or tens of thousands of volts—the insulation value of work boots is negligible compared to these voltages. Similarly, wearing standard work gloves or using fibreglass ladders instead of aluminium provides no meaningful protection against power line voltages. Specialised high-voltage electrical workers use voltage-rated equipment including insulated gloves tested to specific voltage levels, insulated tools, and insulated aerial devices, but these specialised protections are appropriate only for authorised electrical workers conducting work on or very near power lines under controlled conditions—they are not suitable or approved for construction workers whose protection comes from maintaining minimum approach distances. The hierarchy of control for power line safety prioritises elimination through temporary disconnection, engineering controls including physical barriers and height limiters, and administrative controls including exclusion zones and spotter monitoring—PPE is the lowest level of control and inadequate as primary protection. Relying on non-conductive materials or PPE creates false confidence encouraging workers to violate approach distances believing they are protected when in fact they remain at severe risk. Some non-metallic materials including fibreglass, timber, and plastics may conduct electricity when wet, contaminated with moisture, dirt, or chemicals, or when electrical potential is sufficient to cause breakdown of insulation properties. The only safe approach to working near power lines is maintaining minimum approach distances appropriate to the voltage, implementing control measures following the hierarchy of control, and never relying on materials or PPE as primary protection. If work cannot be conducted while maintaining approach distances using appropriate access equipment and methods, the correct response is to request network operator temporary disconnection or isolation rather than proceeding with inadequate protection. Workers who believe that non-conductive equipment or rubber boots provide protection should be re-trained on actual protection requirements before any work near power lines is permitted. Organisations that promote or condone work near power lines relying on non-conductive materials or PPE rather than maintaining approach distances are exposing workers to severe and likely fatal risks.

Do overhead power lines have insulation that makes them safe to touch?

No, the vast majority of overhead power lines do not have electrical insulation and those that appear insulated often only have weatherproofing that provides no electrical protection. This critical misunderstanding has caused numerous electrocution deaths where workers contacted lines they believed were safely insulated. The coverings visible on many overhead conductors are weatherproofing materials designed to protect the conductor from corrosion, UV exposure, and environmental degradation—these coverings are not electrical insulation rated for the voltages being carried and do not prevent electrocution upon contact. True insulated aerial cables exist in some installations, particularly for low-voltage service connections and underground-to-aerial transitions, but distinguishing genuinely insulated cables from weatherproofed conductors requires electrical expertise that most construction workers do not possess. Visually, weatherproofing and insulation can appear identical, both presenting as black or dark-coloured coverings on conductors. The critical difference is that electrical insulation is rated to withstand specific voltages and prevents current flow when contacted, whilst weatherproofing provides no electrical resistance and conducts current upon contact. Many weatherproofed conductors are colloquially called 'insulated' by persons who do not understand the technical distinction, spreading dangerous misinformation. Even genuinely insulated cables can have damaged insulation from weather exposure, tree contact, animal damage, or previous impacts that is not visible from ground level—damaged insulation creates exposed conductor capable of electrocution. The electrical industry practice is to treat all overhead conductors as bare uninsulated energised wires regardless of any covering appearance, maintaining full minimum approach distances at all times. This conservative approach recognises that visual assessment cannot reliably determine whether coverings provide electrical protection, and that the consequences of incorrect assessment are immediate electrocution. Workers must be trained that black or grey coverings on overhead conductors do not indicate safe insulation, that all overhead lines must be treated as bare energised conductors, that minimum approach distances must be maintained from all overhead conductors without exception, and that the only reliable protection is maintaining clearance rather than relying on insulation presence. Network operators can confirm whether specific cables are genuinely insulated, but even with confirmation, maintaining approach distances remains appropriate as damaged insulation can expose bare conductors. Some specialised low-voltage installations including aerial bundled conductors (ABC) used in some residential areas do incorporate electrical insulation, but high-voltage distribution and transmission lines are virtually never insulated—they operate as bare conductors. The safest approach is to assume all overhead power lines are bare energised conductors requiring full minimum approach distance maintenance. If any worker suggests that lines are safely insulated allowing closer approach or direct handling, immediate re-training is required as this misconception is likely fatal. Organisations must explicitly train that visual appearance of coverings on conductors does not indicate electrical insulation and must not be used to justify reduced approach distances or relaxed safety controls.

How far in advance do I need to request temporary power line disconnection from network operators?

Temporary power line disconnection requests should be submitted to network operators minimum 10 business days in advance of the required disconnection date, though many network operators prefer longer notice periods of 15-20 business days for complex disconnection arrangements. This advance notice is necessary because network operators must undertake several preparatory steps before disconnecting supply: assessing the feasibility of disconnection including whether the line can be isolated without affecting broader network operations; identifying all customers who will lose power during the disconnection; notifying affected customers in advance as required by regulatory obligations (typically minimum 4 business days notice); arranging alternative supply configurations if power must be maintained to some customers whilst the specific line is de-energised; scheduling field crews to perform isolation and subsequent re-energisation; and coordinating timing to align with network operational requirements and work crew availability. For minor disconnections affecting limited customers and straightforward isolation procedures, 10 business days may be adequate. For complex disconnections affecting multiple customers, requiring network reconfiguration, or involving coordination across multiple distribution zones, 20 business days or more may be required. Some network operators specify minimum notice periods in their service standards or connection agreements—verify specific requirements for your network operator when planning disconnection requests. Emergency disconnection for immediate hazards can typically be arranged within hours, but this emergency service is reserved for genuine hazards requiring urgent response and should not be used as alternative to proper planning. When submitting disconnection requests, provide comprehensive information including exact location of work and power lines (street address and GPS coordinates if possible); detailed description of work activities requiring disconnection; requested disconnection start date and time; duration of disconnection required (how many hours work will take); and contact details for site coordinator authorised to confirm work completion allowing re-energisation. Be prepared for network operators to offer alternative solutions including temporary insulation barriers, relocated lines, or altered work methods that may allow work to proceed without full disconnection—evaluate these alternatives considering cost, complexity, and safety compared to full disconnection. Understand that requested disconnection dates may not be available due to network operator scheduling constraints—maintain flexibility in work scheduling to accommodate network operator timing. Some network operators charge fees for temporary disconnection services particularly where significant network reconfiguration is required—enquire about costs during disconnection request. Factor network operator response time and coordination into overall project scheduling, submitting disconnection requests during early planning phases rather than waiting until work is imminent. If disconnection requests cannot be accommodated within project timelines, reassess whether work can proceed safely maintaining minimum approach distances using alternative access methods, or whether project schedules need adjustment to allow adequate disconnection planning time. Early and comprehensive communication with network operators improves disconnection request success rates and ensures adequate time for all preparatory steps. Maintain records of all disconnection request correspondence and confirmations as evidence of proactive electrical safety management.

Related SWMS documents

Browse all documents

working-at-height

Erecting Fixed Scaffold Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS for planning, erecting, inspecting, and dismantling fixed scaffolding including structural design, fall protection, material handling, and compliance verification.

View document

working-at-height

Erecting Suspended Powered Scaffolds Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS for installing and commissioning suspended powered scaffold systems including structural verification, rigging, counterweight safety, electrical systems, load testing, and inspection procedures.

View document

working-at-height

EWP-Boom-Cherrypicker-Scissor Lift Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS for operating boom lifts, cherry pickers, and scissor lifts including licensing requirements, pre-start inspections, stability assessment, and emergency procedures.

View document

working-at-height

Height Access Equipment Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS covering selection, inspection, assembly, and safe use of various height access equipment types including platforms, towers, and access systems.

View document

working-at-height

Ladders Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS for extension ladders, step ladders, and platform ladders including selection criteria, setup procedures, securing methods, and safe use requirements.

View document

working-at-height

Mobile Scaffold Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS for mobile tower scaffolds including assembly procedures, stability verification, movement protocols, and platform loading management.

View document
Trusted by 1,500+ Australian construction teams

Overhead Electric Lines - Working Near SWMS Sample

Professional SWMS created in 5 seconds with OneClickSWMS

  • Instant PDF & shareable link
  • Auto-filled risk matrix
  • Editable Word download
  • State-specific compliance
  • Digital signature ready
  • Version history preserved
Manual creation2-3 hours
OneClickSWMS5 seconds
Save 99% of admin time and eliminate manual errors.
Generate SWMS NowView sample SWMS

No credit card required • Instant access • Unlimited drafts included in every plan

PDF Sample

Risk Rating

BeforeHigh
After ControlsLow

Key Controls

  • • Pre-start briefing covering hazards
  • • PPE: hard hats, eye protection, gloves
  • • Emergency plan communicated to crew

Signature Ready

Capture digital signatures onsite and store revisions with automatic timestamps.

Continue exploring

Hand-picked SWMS resources
Ewp Boom Cherrypicker Scissor LiftExplore →Crane Lifting EquipmentExplore →

Ready to deliver professional SWMS in minutes?

OneClickSWMS powers thousands of compliant projects every week. Join them today.

Join 2,000+ Protected CompaniesExplore Safety Guides