Falls During Edge Protection Installation and Removal
HighThe installation of edge protection systems creates an inherent paradox—workers must access unprotected edges to install the protection that will subsequently safeguard others. This creates the highest risk phase of edge protection operations, as installers work at exposed edges, lean over perimeters to position components, and handle heavy rail sections and posts near fall hazards. Installation often occurs during early construction stages when access is via ladders or incomplete scaffolding, compounding fall risks. Workers may need to temporarily disable sections of partially installed protection to position additional components, creating brief periods of unprotected exposure. Weather conditions during installation including wind that affects balance and rain that creates slippery surfaces further elevate risks. The pressure to complete installations quickly before other trades commence work may lead to shortcuts in fall arrest use or positioning procedures. Removal of edge protection at project completion presents similar hazards, often occurring after primary focus has shifted to new projects and with less supervision than during installation phases.
Consequence: Fatal or serious injuries to installers falling from unprotected edges during system installation or removal, head injuries from striking structures during falls, and crushing injuries from dropped rails or posts striking workers below.
Inadequate Structural Fixings and Attachment Failures
HighEdge protection systems rely on secure structural attachment to withstand horizontal loads from workers falling against rails, vertical loads from workers climbing or sitting on barriers, and wind loads on exposed sites. Inadequate fixings create catastrophic failure scenarios where the entire protection system collapses when subjected to load, providing no fall prevention capability at the critical moment. Common fixing failures include pins inserted into undersized holes that allow post movement, clamps attached to structural elements lacking adequate load capacity, weighted bases with insufficient mass to resist horizontal loads on sloped surfaces, fixings placed in deteriorated concrete that crumbles under load, and attachments to formwork or temporary structures not designed to support edge protection loads. Corrosion of fixing components from weather exposure weakens connections over time. Fixings that appear adequate during installation may loosen from vibration, thermal cycling, and construction activities. Incompatibility between edge protection system specifications and actual roof or slab edge conditions may result in improvised fixing methods that lack proper engineering validation.
Consequence: Complete edge protection system failure when workers fall against rails, resulting in falls from height with catastrophic injuries or fatalities, and loss of confidence in safety systems undermining safety culture across the site.
Non-Compliant Rail Heights and Spacing Creating Gap Hazards
HighEdge protection effectiveness depends critically on maintaining compliant dimensions including top rail height of 900-1100mm, mid-rail positioning that prevents workers sliding under the top rail, toe board height of minimum 100mm, and maximum post spacing of 2 metres. Non-compliant installations create gaps through which workers can fall or slide. Top rails installed below 900mm height allow workers to topple over barriers when falling against them. Excessive spacing between top and mid-rails creates openings where workers can slip through, particularly if they fall and rotate whilst striking the barrier. Missing or inadequate toe boards allow workers who have slipped on roof surfaces to slide under barriers before being able to arrest their movement. Post spacing exceeding 2 metres allows rail deflection that creates dangerously large gaps when horizontal loads are applied. Installers unfamiliar with AS/NZS 4994.1 requirements may use rail configurations that appear protective but fail to meet dimensional compliance. Budget pressures may lead to minimising components, resulting in wider spacing and fewer mid-rails than standards require.
Consequence: Workers falling through gaps in non-compliant edge protection systems, resulting in falls from height that barriers were intended to prevent, serious injuries or fatalities, and potential prosecution for failing to provide compliant safety systems.
Damage and Displacement from Construction Activities
HighOnce installed, edge protection systems face ongoing risks of damage and displacement from normal construction activities including mobile plant movements, materials handling, impact from lifted loads, workers climbing over barriers instead of using designated access points, and deliberate temporary removal for access that is not properly reinstated. Forklifts, telehandlers, and cranes operating near edges can strike barrier posts or rails, dislodging fixings or bending components. Materials packages lowered by crane can impact edge protection during positioning. Workers carrying long materials such as scaffold tubes, timber lengths, or steel sections can inadvertently sweep barriers aside. Wind loading on partially completed buildings can impose forces exceeding design loads on exposed edge protection. Scaffold alterations adjacent to edge protection can disturb fixings or require temporary barrier removal. The dynamic construction environment means multiple trades and activities interact with edge protection daily, with each interaction creating potential for damage that may not be immediately reported or noticed.
Consequence: Progressive deterioration of edge protection effectiveness creating fall hazards that manifest when workers rely on damaged barriers, sudden barrier failure under load, and incidents where workers fall through gaps created by displaced or missing components.
Inadequate Load Capacity on Weighted Freestanding Systems
HighFreestanding edge protection systems rely on counterweights rather than structural fixings to resist horizontal and vertical loads. These systems use weighted bases supporting vertical posts, with the weight of bases providing resistance to overturning when horizontal loads are applied to rails. Inadequate weight in bases creates scenarios where systems topple when workers fall against them or when wind loads are applied. Common deficiencies include insufficient counterweight mass for the rail height and span being protected, counterweight placement that doesn't properly stabilise the base geometry, bases positioned on sloped surfaces where effective weight is reduced, and progressive weight reduction as counterweights are removed for other purposes. Freestanding systems on pitched roofs face gravitational forces trying to slide bases down slopes, requiring additional weight beyond flat surface requirements. Strong wind conditions can generate horizontal loads exceeding the resistance provided by standard counterweights. Workers may relocate lightweight components of freestanding systems without understanding the engineered weight requirements, compromising stability.
Consequence: Edge protection systems toppling when subjected to loads, eliminating fall protection at the moment it is needed, workers falling from height when barriers fail, and projectile hazards from falling edge protection components striking workers below.
Failure to Maintain Protection During Sequential Construction Phases
MediumConstruction projects progress through multiple phases with different trades and activities occurring in sequence. Edge protection installed during initial structural work must be maintained, adapted, or replaced as construction advances through subsequent phases. Common failures include edge protection removed to facilitate one activity but not reinstated before the next activity commences, barriers removed from completed areas before all elevated work is finished, inadequate coordination between trades leading to gaps in protection during handover periods, and assumption that permanent building elements provide edge protection before they are actually installed and secure. Scaffolding removal may eliminate integrated edge protection before alternative barriers are established. Facade installation work may require temporary removal of edge protection at specific locations, creating unprotected periods if procedures are inadequate. The transition from rough construction to fit-out phases often sees reduced attention to edge protection as fall hazards are perceived to diminish, despite ongoing elevated work by services trades.
Consequence: Workers exposed to unprotected edges during transitional phases between construction activities, falls from height during activities where protection was assumed to be present, and incidents occurring during non-routine activities where edge protection status was not verified.